owennnm
2020-04-13T15:24:39+00:00
一位博主发了相关的博,然后楼下出现了质疑真实性的发言[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202004/22/-7Q5-foi7ZkT3cSu0-ot.jpg.medium.jpg[/img][img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202004/22/-7Q5-g3laK1zT1kSg0-sg.jpg.medium.jpg[/img]
而在博主贴出纽约时报的原文时,质疑者捏造了博主从没用过的“全部”然后又脑补出了报道中从没提到的所谓“百分之五权重”[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202004/22/-7Q5-l5yhZlT3cSu0-ob.jpg.medium.jpg[/img]然后该说法被拆穿后,玩起了文字游戏,说31死于饿死想想都不可能,理论上该有其他死法,博主属于造谣[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202004/22/-7Q5-itgzZgT3cStp-kt.jpg.medium.jpg[/img][img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202004/22/-7Q5-6pz4ZjT3cSu0-j1.jpg.medium.jpg[/img]
而在博主贴出纽约时报的原文时,质疑者捏造了博主从没用过的“全部”然后又脑补出了报道中从没提到的所谓“百分之五权重”[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202004/22/-7Q5-l5yhZlT3cSu0-ob.jpg.medium.jpg[/img]然后该说法被拆穿后,玩起了文字游戏,说31死于饿死想想都不可能,理论上该有其他死法,博主属于造谣[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202004/22/-7Q5-itgzZgT3cStp-kt.jpg.medium.jpg[/img][img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202004/22/-7Q5-6pz4ZjT3cSu0-j1.jpg.medium.jpg[/img]