复星可以买起来了，灭活对广州的delta变种效果不太好

波士顿圆脸说灭活更好

[quote][pid=525854995,27277440,1]Reply[/pid] Post by [uid=2419151]mnet[/uid] (2021-06-20 07:44):
波士顿圆脸说灭活更好[/quote]如果你拿英国新增说事，那没什么好聊的

你要是关注过英国的数据，就知道外国的更不好

复星产量不够 还得靠国产MRNA

因为灭活不好，所以mrna的会更好？

[quote][pid=525855488,27277440,1]Reply[/pid] Post by [uid=18551896]末发神枪埃蒙斯[/uid] (2021-06-20 07:50):
因为灭活不好，所以mrna的会更好？[/quote]感兴趣的自然会去了解相关数据，复星只是我看好，你随意好吧。如果真想看数据，微博，知乎的数据还是挺全面的，当然吵架的就算了

复兴70买的站山岗

现在打mrna的都是小白鼠，毕竟时间太短，以后有什么损伤，未知，也算为了科学，做出贡献了

[s:ac:汗]打了疫苗会被感染不是很正常吗

According to figures gathered by Public Health Scotland?and?published in the Lancet, at least two weeks after the second dose of Covid jabs, protection against infection fell from 92% for the Alpha variant to 79% against the Delta variant for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, while for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine the protection fell from 73% to 60% respectively.

Protection against symptomatic disease has also been found to differ depending on the variant.

According to the?latest figures from Public Health England?(PHE), four weeks after one dose, either vaccine offered almost 50% protection against the Alpha variant. However for the Delta variant this protection was lower, with one dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech jab offering about 36% protection against symptomatic disease. For one dose of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine this figure was about 30%.

Two weeks after the second dose, the differences in vaccine effectiveness by variant were more modest, with the Pfizer/BioNTech jab offering 88% protection against symptomatic disease with the Delta variant, compared with 94% protection against the Alpha variant. For the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, the figures were 67% and 74% respectively.

PHE has previously noted?there may be a number of reasons why the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine has lower figures for either variant, including that it takes longer to reach maximum effectiveness.

来源 Guardian Australia

不如去买康希诺了，重组疫苗应该是下一阶段的主打疫苗

[quote][pid=525856014,27277440,1]Reply[/pid] Post by [uid=62704229]让人承认错误是很难的[/uid] (2021-06-20 07:56):

感兴趣的自然会去了解相关数据，复星只是我看好，你随意好吧。如果真想看数据，微博，知乎的数据还是挺全面的，当然吵架的就算了[/quote]微博知乎的数据是什么鬼，没点正经机构的？

ps:这帖子两天前看到过一模一样的[s:ac:茶]

[quote][pid=525856014,27277440,1]Reply[/pid] Post by [uid=62704229]让人承认错误是很难的[/uid] (2021-06-20 07:56):

感兴趣的自然会去了解相关数据，复星只是我看好，你随意好吧。如果真想看数据，微博，知乎的数据还是挺全面的，当然吵架的就算了[/quote]微博上歪屁股的多的是，比如子陵在听歌等
自动忽略国外疫苗不好的新闻

辉瑞疫苗等失效的新闻也一大堆
之前一个美国打完疫苗后的医学类教授回印度，几天就挂了
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202106/20/jmQ2o-ldlqZkT3cSlc-sg.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202106/20/jmQ2o-gc0hZgT3cSlc-sg.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202106/20/jmQ2o-k120ZpT3cSlc-sg.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202106/20/jmQ2o-lagjZ1mT3cSlc-sg.jpg[/img]

mrna疫苗高度靶向化，这玩意从原理上就不靠谱，不知道你吹个什么劲。

[s:ac:哭笑]到今天竟然还有人觉着打了疫苗就一定百毒不侵了

mrna小白鼠谁愿意当谁当
反正我不当

2021 6月底了。就别高强度疫苗对线
妈的都死那么多了，居然改不死心。

the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 88% effective against symptomatic disease from the B.1.617.2 variant 2 weeks after the second dose, compared to 93% effectiveness against the B.1.1.7 variant
[url]https://www.gov.uk/government/news/vaccines-highly-effective-against-b-1-617-2-variant-after-2-doses[/url]
你们要的英国数据，PHE英格兰官方卫生部门的
BNT效果确实好