Shammy
2021-12-26T23:13:21+00:00
眾所周知, Intel在12代首次引入了大小核架構, 並將其中兩個大核的面積換成了8個小核, 那麼這些小核的實際性能又是否值得?
本測試將通過開啟和關閉12900KF的8個小核, 從而研究小核Gracemont的實際性能
測試平台1:
12900KF P Core 5.0GHz, E Core 4.0GHz
DDR5 5200C38 32GB
ROG Z690 Apex
ROG 3090 Strix OC
測試平台2:
12900KF P Core 5.0GHz
DDR5 5200C38 32GB
ROG Z690 Apex
ROG 3090 Strix OC
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-a8bhZpT3cSs7-s7.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-cnzbZqT3cSsa-s7.jpg[/img]
測試項目1: CPUZ
12900KF 8P+8E = 11731.7
12900KF 8P = 8184.6
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為3547.1, 提供了43.3%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-j4pbZiT3cSs7-s7.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-h3hbZiT3cSs6-s3.jpg[/img]
測試項目2: Cinebench R15
12900KF 8P+8E = 4207
12900KF 8P = 2924
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為1283, 提供了43.9%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-6709ZeT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-l361ZeT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
測試項目3: Cinebench R20
12900KF 8P+8E = 10792
12900KF 8P = 7772
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為3020, 提供了38.9%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-22fsZfT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-5j79ZfT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
測試項目4: Cinebench R23
12900KF 8P+8E = 27988
12900KF 8P = 19931
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為8057, 提供了40.4%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-kbxaK2fT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-9y22K2hT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
測試項目5: Time Spy Extreme
12900KF 8P+8E = 9629
12900KF 8P = 7177
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為2452, 提供了34.2%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-433mZfT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-6yrfZfT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
測試項目6: V-Ray Benchmark
12900KF 8P+8E = 19186
12900KF 8P = 14639
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為4547, 提供了31.1%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-4cllK2mT3cSsg-ih.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-5xovK2mT3cSsg-ij.jpg[/img]
測試項目7: Corona Benchmark
12900KF 8P+8E = 9161510
12900KF 8P = 6598030
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為2563480, 提供了38.9%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-67zpZkT3cSsg-dy.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-1p9cZkT3cSsg-dy.jpg[/img]
測試項目8: AIDA64 Stress FPU
12900KF 8P+8E = 214W
12900KF 8P = 180W
由此可見, 8個小核的功耗為34W, 相對於個8大核, 額外產生了18.9%的功耗
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-4kxbK2rT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-36beK2rT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
總結, 8個4.0GHz的小核大約等同一顆默頻的8700K, 最多可以提供43.9%的加成, 最少可以提供31.1%的加成
平均而言, 4.0GHz 8C8T的Gracemont擁有38.7%的8C16T 5.0GHz的Golden Cove的性能, 卻只增加了18.9%的功耗, 能耗比較後者高出一倍以上, 是名副其實的小身軀大能量
本測試將通過開啟和關閉12900KF的8個小核, 從而研究小核Gracemont的實際性能
測試平台1:
12900KF P Core 5.0GHz, E Core 4.0GHz
DDR5 5200C38 32GB
ROG Z690 Apex
ROG 3090 Strix OC
測試平台2:
12900KF P Core 5.0GHz
DDR5 5200C38 32GB
ROG Z690 Apex
ROG 3090 Strix OC
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-a8bhZpT3cSs7-s7.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-cnzbZqT3cSsa-s7.jpg[/img]
測試項目1: CPUZ
12900KF 8P+8E = 11731.7
12900KF 8P = 8184.6
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為3547.1, 提供了43.3%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-j4pbZiT3cSs7-s7.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-h3hbZiT3cSs6-s3.jpg[/img]
測試項目2: Cinebench R15
12900KF 8P+8E = 4207
12900KF 8P = 2924
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為1283, 提供了43.9%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-6709ZeT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-l361ZeT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
測試項目3: Cinebench R20
12900KF 8P+8E = 10792
12900KF 8P = 7772
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為3020, 提供了38.9%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-22fsZfT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-5j79ZfT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
測試項目4: Cinebench R23
12900KF 8P+8E = 27988
12900KF 8P = 19931
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為8057, 提供了40.4%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-kbxaK2fT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-9y22K2hT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
測試項目5: Time Spy Extreme
12900KF 8P+8E = 9629
12900KF 8P = 7177
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為2452, 提供了34.2%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-433mZfT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-6yrfZfT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
測試項目6: V-Ray Benchmark
12900KF 8P+8E = 19186
12900KF 8P = 14639
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為4547, 提供了31.1%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-4cllK2mT3cSsg-ih.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-5xovK2mT3cSsg-ij.jpg[/img]
測試項目7: Corona Benchmark
12900KF 8P+8E = 9161510
12900KF 8P = 6598030
由此可見, 8個小核的得分為2563480, 提供了38.9%的加成
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-67zpZkT3cSsg-dy.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-1p9cZkT3cSsg-dy.jpg[/img]
測試項目8: AIDA64 Stress FPU
12900KF 8P+8E = 214W
12900KF 8P = 180W
由此可見, 8個小核的功耗為34W, 相對於個8大核, 額外產生了18.9%的功耗
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-4kxbK2rT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
[img]https://img.nga.178.com/attachments/mon_202201/03/9aQ2p-36beK2rT3cSsg-g0.jpg[/img]
總結, 8個4.0GHz的小核大約等同一顆默頻的8700K, 最多可以提供43.9%的加成, 最少可以提供31.1%的加成
平均而言, 4.0GHz 8C8T的Gracemont擁有38.7%的8C16T 5.0GHz的Golden Cove的性能, 卻只增加了18.9%的功耗, 能耗比較後者高出一倍以上, 是名副其實的小身軀大能量